nau | english | rothfork | teaching | eng522
Rhetoric & Writing in
Arts & Letters
ENG 522: Rhetoric & Writing in Professional Communities
BAA 324 (Babbitt Academic Annex, next to the English bldg.); hours: M-F 9-11
Accepted in either the certificate program or the MA professional writing track
After registering, access
the course on the first day of class. Use you dana account user name
& password. I do not know your email address. If you register for the course, it is your obligation to access the class at the beginning of the
class. Do not wait for me to send you an email. Unfortunately, I can't provide you access to the course before it is open or begins.
Writing is not
simply writing. Professional writing
is not self-expression. It is driven by reader needs, not an author's
interests. This course will help you recognize
& define contexts, audiences,
& “discourse communities”; such specific communities as:
Even though it may not be a conscious decision, you have in mind a context or an implied audience when you write a document. You write to your teacher or to a friend or to an unknown official at an agency & the context or situation influences your style, organization, & rhetorical strategy.
Easy writing is addressed to an audience with whom you share values, methods, & experiences. You assume such readers can "read between the lines." Providing an occasion for you to write, a discourse community becomes a kind of co-author. The organization of a community determines who speaks (or writes), when they speak, how they speak, what tone they use, how long they speak, to whom they speak, why they speak, and what they can say. Because little of this is explicitly defined, it is important to recognize & analyze discourse communities in order to write successful documents. In this course, you will:
Informally, I might describe the concern of this class as "psyching out" readers to know what they are thinking, how they are reacting, & what they want. The better you know someone—as with members of your family—the more adept you are at doing this. Rather than developing a psychological "profile" of someone, this course strives to develop a sociological or rhetorical profile. Once you know what someone is thinking in a professional or workplace situation & what motivates them, the next step is to get them to do what you want or what your organization wants by grafting the two together. You do that by developing a rhetorical strategy for the documents you write.
Course Structure & Texts:
Component Text Theory Foucault, Michel. The Archeology of Knowledge.
Pantheon: isbn 0-394-71106-8.
Case Study Work Peterson, Gary. Communicating in Organizations.
Allyn Bacon: isbn 0-205-29589-4.
Illustration & Analysis Hogan, J. Michael. Rhetoric & Community.
Univ. S. Carolina Pr: isbn 1-57003-185-1.
The Foucault book is easy to find. The other two are more difficult to find. The links above take you to Amazon; used books are fine.
Each unit has several components. Here is a sample, the directions for completing unit 01:
English 522 | Unit 01
What to do in lesson 01:
- Read Foucault's The Archaeology of Knowledge: pp. 21-39.
The 2 Webpages on Foucault offer notes on The Archaeology of Knowledge.
You must study read the text in association with reading through the notes on the 2 Webpages.
- Read the Webpages for Unit 01.
- When you are ready, take Quiz 01 on the reading.
You can take it as many times as you like (28 points).
- Contribute to the class discussion page. Your discussion contributions are graded. 10 points available for this unit.
- Read how to do case studies. This page is accessible from Study Tools.
Do case #3 in the Peterson book, "Scribe & Send" (36-40), questions: 1 & 4 (p. 40).
Consider these additional questions:
5.1 Identify & discuss Ann's management style. Should she change? How?
5.2 Pursuant to #4, is it time to reorganize? What makes you think so? What recommendations do you (Ann) make to Juan Carolos Molinio?
7 points each: total 28 points.
- Visit the Glossary page. Suggest terms from the reading that you would like me to define. If a definition isn't helpful, let me know. E-mail me your suggestions. This is not a graded assignment. It is optional.
There are 66 points available in unit 01.
This sample suggests the course workload:
"I hate teams!"
Me too. I complained about the few teams I was assigned to as a student
because the grade went on my transcript. Academic scholarship remains an individual competition. The reason I rely
on teams in this course is that:
This is the course in the Certificate program that acquaints you with team methods. You should not get stuck carrying the load for your group. It is more important to learn something about how to work on a team than it is to solve the cases. No one will be responsible for more than 2 reports on behalf of their group.
|Course paper & critiques of other papers||100|
(The numbers may not be accurate, but they give a sense of relative importance for different activities in the class.)
A: 90% of the total points
There are 10
lessons in the course.
Each lesson is scheduled for about 10 days; see the
All lessons are available throughout the course.
But, this is not a self-paced class, nor a tutorial. The course follows the university calendar. The calendar tool in the course specifies the schedule.
Emergency: If BBLearn is off-line for some time, you can contact me outside the course. This is from E-Learning Center:
In all cases initial contact regarding WebCT problems from students should be through the ITS Help Desk
Although we will primarily use
WebCT's email in this course, you should be aware that Dana accounts
are NAU's official email
channel for communicating with students. Be sure to check your Dana email regularly for information that might affect you.
In the event of a technical problem with WebCT, I will communicate with you through your Dana email.
If you have used the ITS Email
Account Manager (see
http://www.nau.edu/its and Click on Manage Your Email Accounts)
forward your Dana email to some other email account, such as Yahoo or AOL, you do so at your own risk. NAU isn't responsible
for any delays you might experience in retrieving necessary information from some other email account.
You might also give a
bit of thought about what you might do in the event that your computer
crashes. If you don't have a backup
or access to a family or friend's computer, public libraries often offer a limited resource.
Home Teaching NAU English NAU Home Email: firstname.lastname@example.org 05.31.11